Last updated: 20 September, 2012

Turkish court hears final arguments in military coup trial

A Turkish court heard final arguments Thursday in the trial of hundreds of active and retired military officers accused of plotting to overthrow the Islamic-rooted government.

The two-year-long case is wrapping up at the court in Silivri, near Istanbul, which heard the final testimonies of the suspects in the so-called “Sledgehammer” trial, named after a 2003 military exercise.

Prosecutors have demanded up to 20 years in prison for the 365 military officers in the case, which concerns alleged army plans to bomb historic mosques in Istanbul and spark conflict with neighbouring Greece to facilitate a military coup.

The defendants argue that the alleged plot was a military exercise regularly held by the army, and question the authenticity of some documents presented as evidence.

A final verdict was expected later Thursday, the first from a series of cases targeting the army.

The trial, which began in December 2010, stands out in Turkish politics because it directly attacks the secular army, once untouchable in the predominantly Muslim country, where it authored four coups in half a century.

At Thursday’s hearing, the judge listened to the defence of Cetin Dogan, former commander of the First Army and suspected of being the “mastermind” behind the 2003 plan to drive the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) from power.

“Here we see a process unfolding to make the soldiers of Mustafa Kemal (Ataturk, the founder of modern Turkey), who give their lives for their country, to pay the price of their commitment to the Republic and its principles,” said the ex-general, according to the written transcript of his defence.

Dogan branded the trial as “unfair and unlawful,” claiming it had been launched by supporters with “a mentality considering all those who do not belong to their brotherhood as enemies.”

His remarks will likely be seen as an implicit reference to the AKP government and the influence on the judiciary of Islamic cleric Fethullah Gulen’s religious movement.

Around 250 of the defendants are standing trial under arrest.

All the defendants have denied the charges and branded evidence as fabricated. Their lawyers were absent from the courtroom in a protest against what they dubbed a lack of willingness on the part of the court to verify the authenticity of documents presented.

“The verdict given will not be lawful but political. We are the victims of a settlement with the army,” said General Bilgin Balanli.

Hundreds of suspects, including army officers, journalists and lawmakers, are being tried separately over their alleged role in plotting to topple the Islamic-rooted government.

Pro-government circles have praised the trial as a step toward democracy, but pro-secular ones have branded it a witch-hunt to silence opposition.

The coup trials are also seen as part of an effort by the current AKP government to roll back the military’s influence in politics.

The Turkish army, which sees itself as the guarantor of Turkey’s secular principles, overthrew three governments in 1960, 1971 and 1980.

And in 1997, it pressured an Islamic-leaning prime minister, Necmettin Erbakan, to step down. Erbakan was the political mentor of current Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.